"In the process of investigation of cases of fake letters, both the House, the Police and the Court itself equally get a new fact. The question mark, why did the police actually set the Hussein that his signature was forged as a suspect," he said during the "open house" at the residence personal in the New Sambilegi, Depok, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Sunday.
He wrote in a letter that is not true, signature Hussein only in "scan only" and not a signature in ink so that it is not the signature is affixed to the original question.
"There are two letters where one false and one true, the fake letter was dated August 14, 2009 regarding the determination of the number of candidates 112/PAN.MK/VIII/2009 Hanura Goddess Yasin Limpo Dapil as the winner of the Parliament of South Sulawesi. The letter correct dated August 17, 2009, "he said.
He said the second letter was submitted to the Commission by the commissioner of the Court, whereas Hasan Mansuri was told to Andi Nurpati if a letter dated 14 was not true and the truth is that dated 17.
"But in the reconstruction, the Court Commissioner who submitted a letter to the Commission and Andi Nurpati actually read a letter dated August 14, 2009 are false. In fact, the Court concerned has the correct letter dated August 17, 2009 aka. There is a tape in it's reconstruction," he said.
Mahfud said, on the grounds that he was surprised and felt so strange why Zaenal a suspect. And people who read the fake letter was not left unharmed.
"But I submit the assessment to the public. The community has its own understanding of the logic built Police. In this case, the Court did not lose. Instead of nations and law enforcement who suffered losses from the logic of the police," he said.
He said the case is not just art forgery, embezzlement but also art.
"So there are two articles that should be explored," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment